I AM ANGRY BY THE LACK OF WORLD LEADERSHIP in the wake of Islamic terrorism.
I watched and listened for hours many ''expert'' analysis in north American (Canadian and US), also French medias. They are all missing [to present] the bigger picture, the real picture.
When the mass killing occurred in Charlie Hebdo in Paris, President François Holland's reaction was that he was ''shocked'', and he wasn't the only one using that term. Today with the carnage in Paris, UK Prime Minister used it again by saying he is ''shocked'' for the events in Paris. Shocked? Gentlemen, then you must be really out of touch with reality, unless you are the incarnation of hypocrisy. How come I was not shocked then, nor shocked now?
You also hear words like ''saddened''. Sorry gentlemen and gentlewomen but I am neither shocked nor saddened, today. I am angry.
I said and wrote then at the massacre of Charlie Hebdo that those acts were all expected, any time, any day, anywhere. And I was saddened every single day, for many many years, for the lack of leadership around the world and the hypocrisy of the leaders of the so called Western world.
Closing borders, apprehending perpetrators , ''bringing them to justice''. expressing ''shock'', ''surprise'' and ''sadness'' , declaring ''state of emergency'', ''deploying' 1500 soldiers'' as French president François Holland did in France'', and expressing solidarity with France and the French people, aren't enough and show a complete lack of leadership in fighting Islamic extremism and terrorism.
Gentlemen, gentlewomen, we know the SOURCES of these acts of terror and murdering, and we are in a state of war, a special ''undeclared'' war, sometimes even declared, by ISIS, for example. We just need to destroy those SOURCES.
But we keep to have those sources of terror as our ''allies''! It's not only ISIS!
We actually created those sources, if you remember! We actually created those artificial ''Trucial States'' in order for us to rule the oil wealthy region of the Persian Gulf, and the larger region the English Merchant dared to call ''the Middle East'', considering Himself and England as the center of the world.
We actually created the State of Afghanistan in the mid-19th century by declaring war to the ''Persian empire'' and detaching it from it, to create a ''buffer'' state in order to protect our British interests in India from Russia, and in order to simultaneously weaken ''Persia'', in order for us to rule the region and the world. We continue to do so and to keep our troops in the region in order to control it. We created, thanks to George W. Bush, the ISLAMIC state of Afghanistan to replace a former secular monarchy.
We actually created, in 1947, another Islamic state that we still protect, the Islamic State of ''Pakistan'' by joining pieces of Iranian Balouchistan, Afghani Pashtunistan, Punjab and Sind. A state to be officially ruled by his/her Majesty the King/Queen of England/UK, until 1956, when it was decided that Pakistan's dependance to England should become less visible and less obvious.
We actually created, in 1920, the State of Iraq when it was just a territory jointly ruled by the Ottoman and the Persian empires. And we actually traced its borders, yes British officers did trace those borders, deliberately in such a way that Persians and Kurds be submitted and oppressed by a minority of Sunni Arabs, in order to create a state of permanent conflicts between those communities, conflicts that continue to these days: divide and rule was our motto. Remember? We still are militarily present there to keep that state of conflicts. ISIS is the illegitimate child of George W. Bush's military crimes in Iraq. Simultaneously, the same year of 1919-20, we created, with the help of our Colonel Lawrence, - remember?, the even more Islamic and most backward State of Saudi Arabia, an Islamic state belonging to one single big family. All of those ''states'' created by us are, of course, our allies today. That alliance must stop.
Through our ''Pakistan'', which we allowed to possess nuclear weapon in order to control India, we created, in 1979, the Taliban, providing them weapons paid to us by the Emirates, Qatar, and the Saudi king who, together and with our other friend the Emir of Kuwait, own a big chunk of the world's oil. Over 80% of their oil income, I heard, goes back to our Western banks.
And those allies are, financially, the very sources of the Islamic terrorism that encourages killing and murdering around the world, also raping girls and women in Africa and Western Asia (or ''Middle East'' [of England]).
Those sources remain untouched because they assure our financial interests, the interests of the wealthiest of us in the Western world. We keep Saudis and Qataris and Kuwaitis and other Emirates as our allies, despite the fact they are also the financial sources of the Islamic terrorism that kills some of our citizens.
The Talibans were created to fight Russia and its Soviet Union, then. Today, their existence give us the excuse to be militarily present there, and to make sure we control the region. ISIS, Taliban, AlQaida are all for justifying our presence there... Sorry, but you have to realize, M. Cameron, M. Holland, M. Obama, and M. Harper/Trudeau, that ''we'', that ''you'', are in no way innocent in the murdering of innocent people in your own countries, as long as you keep those sources of terrorism as your allies.
We must stop our own ''creatures'' to continue raping humanity, particularly the women. Stop them financing and encouraging those acts of terrors. We must eliminate those sources that permanently attempt to destroy our great human civilization, Islamist forces that aim to politically replace our progressive secular institutions by the regressive Islamic Rule (Qaida) of the Sharia. Otherwise, in the words of a former French ''intellectual'', Roger Garaudy, a former Christian and ''Communist'' ''intellectual'' who converted to Islam, THE FUTURE BELONGS TO ISLAM.
I heard Garaudy presenting his thesis about '' The future belongs to Islam / LE FUTUR APPARTIENT À L'ISLAM'', over 25 years ago, in a conference at Glendon College where I had just started teaching, coming from Iran, running away from the Islamic laws there, for my kids. I challenged him, during the conference, and he seemed defeated, as I was sure he was wrong, and the audience seemed pleased with my challenging him. But now, I am not as sure as I was. On that day, there was not much any female student wearing the hedjab at Glendon College. Today, about one out of ten of them, if not more, are proudly wearing it. I have absolutely nothing against whatever cloth people want to wear, and I appreciate when men and women wear descent ones. But I am scared about the message I am getting.
Do you want a world governed by ISLAM? I do not. I strongly am opposed to the ''submission'' of our developed world, of our free society, and I feel very insecure saying it, and proclaiming it, when I see how ferociously the Islamic militants kill their opponents, and how weak is the reaction of the ''developed'' world, blinded by a politically correctness that is completely out of touch with reality.
Islamic rule is the biggest threat to human civilization, only second to the threat of climate change to our environment. Both threats are the result of the same acts of greed of our wealthiest people around the world, a result of our mercantilist and economist society. A result of our weaknesses, all of us.
What to do? I know what I would do, what I would have done, if I was the President of France or the Secretary General of the United Nations, Prime Minister of Canada or India, President of Iran or Turkey or Tajikistan,,,, if I just had any executive power to do anything in a larger scale.
