Tuesday, 28 July 2020

Implementing minimum wage increase to $15 or $20 will not help but create inflation.



A $20 minimum wage mandatory does not make sense, neither did a $15$ nor does any other price. 

(1) It is not up to a government to interfere in any kind of private business, in any kind of free agreement between consenting adult citizens, whether in the market or in the bedroom or in free speech. A mandatory wage fixed by the government is equivalent to a dictatorship. 

(2) A free market would and should determine prices. Forcing employers to pay a higher salary to their employees would have as an effect either (a) a price increase of the products, creating inflation, the employees having then to pay more for the product they participated in its production, and the inflation sweeping the benefit of the salary increase, or (b) the creation of a black market, agreements hidden from the government, or (c) reduced economic activities, some employers not being able to hold on their businesses 

(3) All of us want to better the lives of the less powerful. In order to do that, we shall institute the Minimum Livable Income which will enable employees to negotiate a salary with their employers in a stronger position, not being needy, so that nobody would need to prostitute oneself. The present system is in favor of prostitution calling it shamelessly "the oldest profession on Earth". Yes, poverty was the oldest situation on Earth.

4) (a) we shall always respect the "free market'' and prohibit any dictator's interference in it, whether the government or other powers (like monopolies), but 
(b) in order to protect the public and the environment, things that are of public interest and of environmental interest shall not be allowed to trade in the private market, instead shall be public property, like the environment itself, waters, forests, mines, gas and oil exploitation (or non-exploitation), electricity companies and any other companies that have a kind of monopoly, national railroads, and the likes. I suggested to Dimitri Laskaris in our private conversation, and I do recommend to all Green Party candidates, that, since INTERAC is being used by all Canadians Debit-cardholders, the benefit of it shall become a source of government income, and not of private banks. 
c) A Green government shall also issue a Credit card by Canada's Central Bank or another Public Bank it will create, the benefits of which to go to public shareholders of the Bank, that is Canadians people. 

These initiatives and others that I have in mind will enable a Green government to decrease taxes, to give economic security to all citizens through the MLI, and to stop the government from acting like dictators (fixing prices and conditions) or highway robbers (forcing people they have been labeling "taxpayers" to give part of their money! It shall also stop the dictatorship of powerful private money and companies that act also like highway robbers.


Friday, 24 July 2020

Is immigration the only solution for economic recovery?






An old man with a white beard named God - god knows where he came from!,  created Adam and then Eve from Adam, they say, and told them go multiply.  And that's one religion. 

Another religion, which does not call itself a religion, started a few centuries ago, saying: (1) it's all about money, getting rich is the ultimate goal, (2) the planet is (should be) divided into Nation-States and each nation-state must only be concerned about increasing its own wealth. 

Adam Smith could be considered [one of] the Prophet of this new religion with his book "An Inquiry into the Wealth of the Nations", without the mantel of the name of "Prophet". 

The mixture of these two "religions", both of them encouraging population increase, gave way to the kind of conversation based on that question: "Is immigration the only solution for economic recovery?" 

Actually, we do not need economic recovery, on the contrary, 
we need happiness, no stress, no pollution. We need love.  

Our present economic system, worldwide, is absurd and based on the acceptance of pure selfishness, hypocrisy, lies, corruption, competition and conflicts, depleting and destroying natural resources, altering the truth, immense pollution threatening our life on Earth, focusing on short term and neglecting the long term consequences of the actions of nearly 8 billion human species. 

We need to put an end to the nonsense. So, for a moment, let's stop immigration (as an economic policy) and let us start reflecting on how to change things on our planet, and becoming the savior, here in this second-largest country on Earth with only 35 million people, where we really can.

Friday, 17 July 2020

GPC LEADERSHIP: AGAINST DISQUALIFICATION OF CANDIDATES EXPRESSING ORIGINAL OR "POLITICALLY INCORRECT" IDEAS



If you want the Green Party of Canada to become the greatest Party, the most open-minded, and the most inclusive, a party that would govern, you must not exclude those who come to you.

I am unfavorable in policing and censoring genuine ideas, deemed “politically incorrect”, whether during this GPC Leadership Campaign or at any other time.

Contrary to many friends here, co-workers to save our planet, I am uncomfortable with the existence of this “vetting committee” and its action in disqualifying candidates for their ideas, the last one being Dylan Perceval-Maxwell. I feel it is important to make my voice heard again, although it might not please many, again.

A Green candidate's proposal on the Agenda TVO prime time Program was bizarre. The reaction of another GPC Leadership contestant wasting prime time TV by attacking him was wrong. Also wrong was the initiative of the “Vetting Committee” or “Leadership Contest Authority” to disqualify that candidate following that incident.

The Statement published by the GPC reads:
«The party’s Leadership Contest Authority (LCA) found that several recent statements by Mr. Perceval-Maxwell were inappropriate and were not aligned with the party’s core values, in particular respect for diversity.» 

Dylan P.-M.’s suggestion of a mandatory $20 payment by any police officer before proceeding to arrest citizens of a certain category, I found bizarre and weird, perhaps wrong, but original. I did not find it racist, considering the context. I understand it can easily be interpreted as being racist, but only “interpreted”. Dylan said he is not a racist. What are we doing? Inquisition? 

That cry of “racism” followed by the disqualification of the candidate sounds to me out of proportion.

Importantly, if the Leadership Contest Authority really cares about (I quote) “the party’s core values, in particular, respect for diversity”, then it would be hard to find a more diverse candidate than the long-time Green member, Dylan Perceval-Maxell, with his bizarre hat and accouterment and bizarre ideas! Unless you limit diversity – understandably, because nowadays fashionable- to race, gender, sexual orientation.

(When disqualified, Dylan was ranking one before last in my ranking of the ten leadership candidates).

Shodja E. Ziaian

Saturday, 4 July 2020

GPC Leadership candidates: number of days it took for their candidacy to be approved and confirmed




GPC Leadership candidates
Number of days it took Candidates to get approval
(listed by order of the date of their candidacy announcement)

# days       Candidate                                   announced          approved
           
154           David Merner                           05 11 19                   08 04 20
107         Judy N. Green                          23 01 20                   10 06 20 disqualified June 2 and reinstated June 10
55             Annamie Paul                           30 01 20                   24 03 20
44             Amita Kuttner                           09 03 20                   22 04 20                  
83             Dimitri Laskaris                        11 03 20                   02 06 20 disqualified May 26, reinstated June 2
73             Dylan Perceval-Maxwell         17 03 20                   29 05 20
12             Glen Murray                            29 04 20                  11 05 20
27             Andrew West                           15 05 20                  11 06 20
11             Meryam Haddad                    22 05 20                     03 06 20
1                Courtney Howard                    11 06 20                   12 06 20

                                                                                                            WITHDRAWALS
63             Julie Tremblay-Cloutier         02 12 19                   14 02 20 citing leadership election rules
139           Alex Tyrell                              15 01 20                   03 06 20 citing E. May & associates meddling
10             Constantine Kritsonis             23 01 20                   03 02 20 following election rules, citing $50,000 too high
119           Don Elzer                                    24 02 20               03 06 20 via email