WHY EVERY GOVERNMENT SHOULD SIDE WITH IRAN, RUSSIA, AND THE SYRIAN GOVERNMENT, AGAINST ISIS, AL QAEDA, AND OTHER ISLAMIC SYRIAN REBELS
In the case of France changing its position in Syria as proposed by the presidential candidate, François Fillon, and choosing to side with Iran and Russia, it is of course the right choice to make that I applaud without any slightest doubt or hesitation. It is the right way to fight Islamic terrorism and ‘’Islamic totalitarianism’’ as Fillon put it.
The choice is between Assad, president of Syria, and Isis that beheads whoever they deem not being Muslim and take their women and girls as spoil of war, as sex slave, there isn't other choice there. There is a war and there are two sides: the choice is between Lebanese Hizbollah who is a legitimate political part of the political Lebanese system, respects parliamentary rules, and helps build social harmony, and helps defend Lebanon against Israeli attacks, in one side, and Al Qaeda and Al Nusra that behead their opponents, lie, and have no mercy for human being, on the other side; the choice is between Iran that supports Assad, and Saudi Arabia that supports the other side. The choice is between UK-US establishments who lie to their own people, hypocritically siding with Syrian rebels, Isis, the Saudis, the Emir of Qatar, and on the other hand Russia that wants to seriously fight Islamic extremism.
I know that millions of Iranians radically and 'violently' do oppose to the present government or regime in Iran; but they should wake up and realize that Iran is unfortunately not located in Europe or North America, that Iran is not a neighbour of Switzerland or Canada. You can only compare Iran's situation with its surroundings and neighbouring : Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, and Saudi Arabia, all involved, one way or another, in the fight that is going on there, a war that is fed by the incendiary participation of the UK-US led military invasion of the region.
Yes, Iran is helping, defending, and supporting Shias, but Shias, even extremists, do not go and bomb Sunni mosques, do not send suicide bombers to kill Sunnis, unlike Sunni and Wahabis extremists who do it against Shi'as whom they consider fake Muslims (they are probably right!) and apostates.They are the one who launch terror attacks and assassinate Shi'as on a daily basis in Iraq, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Yemen, you name it. It's in the daily news. These are facts. Which side would you take if you had to?
Do we like the imposed Hidjab in Iran, do we like the application of the Sharia laws there? No, I am vehemently opposed to it. And I personally look for the occasion, the day foreign troops are out of the region, for a referendum in Iran to bring the constitutional change we want, whenever Iranians would be ready for it. But until that day, even today, compared to its neighbours I just mentioned, Iran is a much better place to be, particularly for women.
Iranians made a big mistake during the Shah's regime. They called him dictator and responsible for anything that wasn't going well. They didn't realize that there will always be things that aren't going well, and that everything is relative. They didn't realize and weren't thinking that the alternative to Mohammad-Reza Pahlavi and the constitutional monarchy would be Ruhollah Khomeyni and an Islamic republic. They forgot about or didn’t noticed all the good and great things the semi-dictatorial rule of Pahlavi brought to their life. Politics do not allow a vacuum. You can't avoid to make a choice. If you don't take side and say I don't care about politics or about making a political choice, politics with take care of you in a way that you might not like it at all, and would make you regret for not having made the 'better' choice. Iranians should realize that the whole region is in war and turmoil, and should appreciate the relative calm and security Iran is living in, compare to neighbours, a security secured to them thanks to the same Iranian leadership and rulers they dislike or hate, whom they criticize for helping Syria fight against ISIS.
Moreover, Iran, the Islamic Republic of Iran, isn't as terrible as you might think. Lebanese Hizbollah isn't what North American or ''Western'' medias want you to believe. President Assad is not making it a sport of bombing his own co-citizens or bombing Syria's own schools and hospitals, as anglo-american medias are suggewting and want you to believe, in their plan to change the Syrian secular regime to an Islamic one, or for a change of regime with their own puppet ruling Syria. President Assad is fighting against some primitive, wild, savage, brutal, Islamic extremists who, if in power, would want to submit all Syria and Syrians to the cruel rule of the Sharia in the primitive brutal way they interpret it; ISIS provided enough examples on how they are many times more brutal than any other known contemporary political or religious movement, even more violent and brutal than Al Qaeda and the Taliban, and many many times more violent and brutal than the Islamists in Iran in the early days of the revolution when Khomeini established the rule of the Sharia in my country of birth. - SEZ
No comments:
Post a Comment